India’s 0-2 Test series loss to South Africa has reopened big questions about India’s preparation, planning, and selection methods. Much of the debate now circles around Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment, which has become a major talking point after repeated failures at home.
Concerns Over Agarkar’s Domestic Match Absence
The Test defeat has brought fresh attention to the way the team is being handled. India’s earlier 2-2 draw against England already feels forgotten, and critics believe the side lacks a proper strategy for home conditions. Since Gautam Gambhir took over as head coach and Agarkar became chairman of selectors, India have been whitewashed twice in home Test series—first by New Zealand in 2024 and now by South Africa. Many experts link this struggle to Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment, which continues to divide opinions.
While Gambhir is facing the bulk of the criticism, Agarkar is also under pressure. Since taking over in 2023, he has used over 30 players in the Test format, a move now widely known as Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment. Some new selections were praised, such as backing Sarfaraz Khan, Dhruv Jurel and Rajat Patidar, who performed well against England early in 2024. But many believe he must also answer for dropping consistent domestic names like Sarfaraz later, along with Abhimanyu Easwaran.
A major complaint is that Agarkar has rarely attended domestic matches. Even though he travels regularly with the Indian team and is present during home Tests and overseas tours, his Ranji Trophy appearances have been limited. This has caused frustration among domestic players, who feel that Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment does not reflect true awareness of ground-level performances.
Over the last year, players like Sai Sudharsan and Nitish Kumar Reddy made Test debuts despite having lower first-class averages than domestic performers such as Sarfaraz, Karun Nair and Easwaran. Critics argue this imbalance is partly due to Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment, where rotation has been prioritised over consistent performers.
Despite the criticism, a BCCI official stated that the board is “not worried” right now. According to the official, every score and player detail is available on the BCCI app, so selectors do not necessarily need to attend every match. Still, the official confirmed that the board will discuss the matter with the selectors following the Test defeat. This review will also likely examine the impact of Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment, which continues to attract scrutiny.
READ MORE:
- Travis Head 69-Ball Century Ashes Knock That Shocked England’s Fast Bowling Attack
- India’s White-Ball Focus After 0-2 Test Loss: Rohit and Kohli Return to Lift ODI Hopes
BCCI Plans Talks With Selectors After Test Debacle
The concerns surrounding Agarkar are not new. When he served as a Mumbai selector, he faced similar complaints about not attending enough domestic matches. Now, the same issue has resurfaced at the national level, adding more fuel to the debate around Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment.
Agarkar has been very visible at international games. He attended the 2024 Border-Gavaskar Trophy against Australia and the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy against England earlier this year. But his domestic cricket visits have been rare. His last notable Ranji Trophy appearance came in 2024 during the Tamil Nadu vs Karnataka fixture in Chennai. Following that match, Devdutt Padikkal received his maiden Test call-up—a decision that many connected with Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment.
Now, with India coming off another disappointing home series, the BCCI is expected to examine the team’s preparation, selection policies, and overall direction. Former players and analysts believe India needs to reconnect with its domestic system and reduce over-experimentation. Many feel that watching players in person, instead of relying only on scorecards, is vital—especially when Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment has already stirred so much debate.
As India look ahead to upcoming home series, clarity and consistency in selection will become even more important. Whether Ajit Agarkar’s Controversial 30-Player Experiment continues or gets replaced with a more stable approach will likely depend on the BCCI’s review in the coming weeks.
SEE MORE:
