India’s Supreme Court is preparing to deliver a crucial ruling on July 18, 2025, regarding the future of the All India Football Federation (AIFF). The decision, officially known as the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict, could completely change how Indian football is governed—and it might even determine the fate of the Indian Super League (ISL).
Here’s everything you need to know about this important case.
Why Is the Supreme Court Involved in Indian Football?
To understand the background of the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict, we need to go back to 2017. That year, the Delhi High Court canceled the AIFF elections, claiming they didn’t follow the National Sports Code.
This matter reached the Supreme Court, which took a strong step in May 2022 by removing Praful Patel from the AIFF presidency. The court then appointed a three-member Committee of Administrators (CoA) to run the federation temporarily.
The CoA drafted a new constitution, but it sparked opposition from multiple state football associations. The situation got even more serious when FIFA temporarily banned India from hosting international tournaments due to “third-party interference.” This forced the Supreme Court to disband the CoA, but work on the constitution continued.
The AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict is the result of a long process. The court handed the task of revising the draft to retired judge Justice L. Nageswara Rao, who sought input from stakeholders including FIFA, AIFF, state associations, and FSDL, the company managing the ISL. By May 2023, the new constitution was ready, and after several hearings, the court reserved its final verdict for July 18, 2025.
READ MORE:
- MMS vs YAR Today’s Dream11 Fantasy Team
- The 10 Best Centre-Back Partnerships Around the World in 2024/25
- Dream11 Team Today
What’s in the New Constitution Being Reviewed?
The upcoming AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict is not just about who runs the AIFF, it involves some serious structural reforms. Justice Rao’s version of the constitution aims to make Indian football more inclusive, transparent, and professional.
Key features include:
- Player Representation: At least five former national players, including two women, in the 14-member Executive Committee.
- Democratic Reforms: Office-bearers can be removed by a no-confidence motion.
- New General Body Setup:
- One representative from each state association
- 15 eminent players (at least five women)
- Three club representatives (from ISL, I-League, and Indian Women’s League)
- Two referee representatives (one male, one female)
- Two coach representatives (one male, one female)
This change reduces the voting power of state associations from two votes to one, making the system more balanced. If the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict approves these changes, it will reshape the power structure inside Indian football.
Other proposed reforms include:
- A maximum tenure of 12 years (with only two consecutive four-year terms allowed)
- An age limit of 70 years for anyone holding office
These updates aim to prevent power from staying in the same hands for too long, creating space for fresh leadership.
Why the Indian Super League Is on Hold
Now, let’s talk about how the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict affects the Indian Super League.
The ISL is managed through a Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between AIFF and FSDL, a Reliance-backed company. That agreement expires in December 2025, but so far, it hasn’t been renewed. In April, AIFF tried to set up a negotiation team to begin talks with FSDL—but the Supreme Court stepped in and told them to wait.
Why? Because if the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict approves the new draft, it could lead to fresh elections within the AIFF. Any new deal with FSDL would then need to be signed by the newly elected office-bearers, not the current team.
That’s why the court has asked all talks about the MRA, and even ISL scheduling, to be put on hold until the AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict is announced.
AIFF also released a statement explaining that all discussions are “in abeyance pending further directions from the Hon’ble Supreme Court.” In simpler terms: Nothing moves until the court decides.
What’s Next for Indian Football?
The AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict on July 18 is a big moment for the sport in India. If the court gives the green light to Justice Rao’s constitution, we might soon see:
- A new AIFF leadership
- Greater involvement from players and coaches
- A stronger push for equality and fairness in football governance
- And most importantly, a clearer path forward for the Indian Super League
The future of Indian football, including the 2025-26 ISL season, hinges on this single legal decision. The AIFF Constitution Supreme Court Verdict isn’t just about legal details, it’s about the direction of football in India for the next decade.
SEE MORE:
